SUMMARY
The frontal lobe seizures
present variable clinical and electroencephalographic features that play some difficulties
in the presurgical work-up for epilepsy. The aim of the present study is to determine the
role of ictal and interictal SPECT in the localization of the epileptogenic zone in
frontal lobe epilepsies. We evaluated 13 patients, 6 men and 7 women, with mean age of
16yr, and with medically intractable frontal lobe seizures. All patients were submitted to
ictal SPECT and 11 also to interictal scans. Ictal SPECT studies were contributive in 54%
of patients, and nonlateralized and nonlocalized, or contralateralized in the remaining
patients. Interictal SPECT showed normal perfusion in 45,5% of patients, hypoperfusion
localized in the suspected epileptogenic zone in 45,5%, and diffuse findings in the other
9%. We conclude that the sensitivity of ictal and interictal SPECT studies in frontal lobe
epilepsies is lower than that for temporal lobe seizures, thus confirming previous data.
Key words:
Frontal lobe epilepsy, frontal lobe seizures, ictal SPECT, interictal SPECT, rCBF,
extratemporal lobe epilepsy.
INTRODUCTION
Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) is
an heterogeneous group of disorders which are characterized by a variety of epileptic
seizures, electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns and etiologies (Harvey et al 1).
The epileptic zone localization based on scalp EEG is often negative, and invasive
evaluation may be necessary. An additional neuroimaging method such as the ictal and
interictal single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) can sometimes be
helpful.
Contrarily to the contribution
of ictal SPECT in temporal lobe seizures, the positive rate of ictal SPECT in FLE is much
lower due to several reasons. The relative inaccessibility of frontal cortex to
electrodes, propagation of spike and wave discharges throughout both hemispheres and
hypercinetic nature of ictal behavior obscuring EEG records. Recordings with intracranial
electrodes may be misleading because frontal lobe has a large area and volume. Among
neuroimaging methods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) often does not show structural
abnormality and computed tomography has less spatial resolution. Ictal Single Photon
Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) may present regional enhancement of cerebral blood
flow (rCBF) in the epileptogenic zone, and because its non-invasive nature, may avoid
invasive EEG. The aim of this study is to determine the ictal and interictal SPECT
contribution to presurgical work-up of medically intractable FLE.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with medically
intractable FLE were included after informed consent was signed. Video-EEG was
continuously performed with 10-20 system plus intermediate electrodes. Seizures were
analyzed by long-term Video-EEG monitoring system VANGARDâ . MRI was performed in a 1,5T
Siemens device, and processed with T1 and T2 weighted, MPR and FLAIR sequences. Syndromic
and topographic diagnosis were made based on the summation of all these informations.
SPECT scans were performed after
ictal and interictal intravenous injections of 1110 MBq of 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer
(99mTc-ECD). Ictally, the injection was performed as soon as technologists and nurses
perceived the first clinical or electroencephalographic signs of seizures. It was
considered ictal when the injection was made until the most evident clinical or EEG
findings end. Interictal SPECT was carried out in a supine position with eyes open, ears
uncovered in a quiet and darkness room, with previous venous puncture. SPECT data were
acquired in 64 projections with 360 degree rotation, with single head camera
(Orbiter-Siemens) equipped with parallel-hole, high resolution and low energy collimator.
Reconstructed slices were displayed on 64x64 matrix. Attenuation correction was performed
using Chang 1st order method. Images were blindly and independently analyzed by
two observers (MK, LWA).
RESULTS
Thirteen patients were submitted
to 16 ictal SPECT scans, 6 men and 7 women, mean age 16yrs (2 to 35yrs). All had Video-EEG
recorded at CIREP between October 1996 and May 1998. All patients performed ictal SPECT
and 11 had interictal SPECT as well. Seven patients had symptomatic FLE, 5 patients
cryptogenic FLE and 1 patient with a suspected familiar FLE. From the symptomatic group
MRI was able to detect Tuberous Sclerosis (3/7), tumor (1/7), gliosis (2/7) and cortical
dysplasia (1/7).
Ictal injections were performed
with a mean latency of 37sec (10sec 1min 7sec) from clinical onset, and 38sec (5sec
- 1min 18sec) from electroencephalographic seizure onset. The mean duration of clinical
and electroencephalographic seizures was 56sec (6sec - 2min 1sec) and 1min 4sec (4sec
2min 12sec), respectively. From tracer injection, the time lag was 22sec (00-54sec)
for clinical, and 31sec (00sec 1min 6sec) for electroencephalographic seizure
duration. The mean time lag for image acquisition was 1h 43min (49min 3h 27min).
Ictal SPECT scans showed:
(1) Lateralized and localized epileptogenic zone in 5 patients (39%); (2) lateralized but
nonlocalized in 2 patients (15%); (3) neither localized nor lateralized in 4 patients
(31%) and (4) contralateralized in other 2 patients (15%). Summing up all series with
positive lateralization, SPECT was helpful in 54% of the cases. SPECT demonstrated spatial
resolution good enough to find the epileptogenic foci and be comparable to MRI findings.
Interictal scans were performed
in 11/13 patients and showed: Normal perfusion in 5/11 patients (45,5%), ipsilateral
frontal lobe hypoperfusion in 5/11 patients (45,5%), and a diffuse hypoperfusion in the
last one patient (9%). From the 5 patients with hypoperfusion in the suspected frontal
lobe, 3 were of the symptomatic group.
Patient 1
(click=zoom)
A 20-yr-old man with seizures since 4mo of age.
Video-EEG showed daily simple partial seizures and occasionally secondary generalization
starting with clonus in the mouth at a right. Scalp EEG was inconclusive and MRI showed
less evident atrophy. Invasive EEG showed seizure onset in left fronto-temporal regions.
The epileptogenic foci was then determined as being frontal after multiple ictal SPECT`s.
Ictal scans showed left focal frontal hyperperfusion, while interictal SPECT was normal.
Patient underwent left frontal lobectomy and is seizure free.
Patient 2
(click=zoom)
A 28-year-old female patient with seizures since
she was 5yo. Tonic seizures with abduction, raising of upper limbs, sometimes preceded by
partial complex seizures. Video-EEG showed diffuse cortical rhythm with peak amplitude in
left frontal lobe. Seizure frequency was 4-5 times a day, predominantly at night. MRI
disclosure dysplasia in the middle and inferior left frontal lobe. Neuropsychologic
examination showed nonlateralized frontal lobe dysfunction. Ictal SPECT showed accentuated
hyperperfusion in dorso-lateral and anterior left frontal region.
Patient 3
(click=zoom)
A 28-year-old male patient with
seizure onset at 7mo of age. He had generalized tonic-clonic seizure while sleeping. Mean
seizure frequency of 2-3 times by night. He had good neuromotor development and nowadays
shows sligth bradipsyquism. Video-EEG showed seizures with onset in right frontal lobe.
Ictal SPECT showed hyperperfusion foci in right orbito-frontal region next to basal
ganglia.
DISCUSSION
The most reliable application of
SPECT in epilepsy is that for temporal lobe seizures. In this setting the result of ictal
/ postictal SPECT studies show increased rCBF in the ipsilateral temporal lobe in ~95% of
patients (Berkovic et al. 2, Newton et al. 3, 4).
Otherwise, this so high result has not been reproduced for frontal lobe epilepsies. For
this reason we aimed to determine how much the ictal / interictal SPECT`s were
collaborative in suggest the localization of the epileptogenic zone in FLE.
We found that the ictal scans
allowed the localization of foci in 39%, and the lateralization of rCBF changes in other
15%. Summing up these two rates, 54% of the patients were benefited from those data. In
the majority of series, in literature, extratemporal epilepsy has had different degrees of
ictal SPECT detection. Stefan et al. 5 reported 3 patients with
frontal lobe epilepsy where ictal SPECT was localized in 2 patients (66%). Marks et al.
6, also reported 3 patients with frontal lobe seizures and obtained similar
results, a positive rate in 2/3 patients (66%). In these two studies, however the sample
was little. Harvey et al. 1, however, correlated ictal SPECT scans with
electroclinical data, and showed that the first was informative in 20/22 (91%) children.
In spite of being high rates, these would be expected due the homogeneous sample of
patients, children, and almost all had partial or behavioral simple partial seizures.
Interictal SPECT showed
ipsilateral hypoperfusion in 45,5% of our patients. Stefan et al 5,
report 3 patients with frontal lobe seizures and interictal SPECT, and none of them showed
localized frontal hypoperfusion. Marks et al 6 reported localized
frontal hypoperfusion in only one of their five patients with FLE. Harvey et al. 1
demonstrated localized, unilateral frontal hypoperfusion concordant with lateralization
from clinical, EEG, MRI, and pathologic data in only two of 22 children (9%).
Our results and those previously
reported by other authors demonstrated that ictal and interictal SPECT have incongruent
sensibilities. This may possibly be due different amount of patients in samples, distinct
tracer used (HMPAO vs ECD) which can have different latencies in quickly availability
besides the inpatient, and the complexity of neurophysiology and anatomy of the frontal
lobes. Devous et al 7 concluded in their meta-analysis about SPECT brain
imaging in epilepsy that there is great variability in the methods and standards of
reporting data from SPECT studies in the literature. He suggest some useful
recommendations for future studies approaching the application of this neuroimaging
technique in epilepsy from which are of prominence: to describe results of EEG, SPECT and
CT/MRI, and the correlation of these resources, describe criteria used to define ictal,
postictal or interical states, and describe EEG morphology and semiology (behavior) at the
time of the injections. These are welcomed issues to be stated in future studies.
REFERENCES
(1) HARVEY, AS et al. Frontal
lobe epilepsy: clinical seizure characteristics and localization with ictal 99mTc-HMPAO
SPECT. Neurology, 1993; 43:1966-1980.
(2) BERKOVIC, SF; Newton, MR;
Rowe CC. Localization of epileptic foci using SPECT. In: Luders HO, editor. Epilepsy
surgery. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 251-6.
(3) NEWTON, MR et al. Postictal
switch in blood flow distribution and temporal lobe seizures. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 1992; 55:891-4.
(4) NEWTON, MR et al. Ictal,
postictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography in the lateralization of
temporal lobe epilepsy. Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21:1067-71.
(5) STEFAN, H. et al. Regional
cerebral blood flow during focal seizures of temporal and frontocentral onset. Ann Neurol,
1990, 27:162-166.
(6) MARKS, DA et al.
Localization of extratemporal epileptic foci during ictal single photon emission computed
tomography. Ann Neurol 1992; 31:250-255.
(7) DEVOUS, MD et al. SPECT
Brain imaging in epilepsy: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:285-293.
|