ABSTRACTS
PRESENTADOS
AL 11th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM "RADIONUCLIDES IN NEPHRO-UROLOGY",
REALIZADO EN MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, 13-17 MAYO 2001.
12. FACTOR
ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC RENAL STUDY REVISITED: DO WE NEED USER-INDEPENDENT
FUZZY REGIONS OF INTEREST.
Sámal
M.(1), Bergmann H Z (2,3), Staudenherz A (4), Mostbeck A (2), Dudczak
R2,(4).
(1)Charles
Univ Prague, CZ, (2) Boltzmann Inst Vienna, A, (3) Biomed Eng Phys,
(4) Univ Hosp AKH Víenna, A, Dept Nucl Med, Univ Hosp AKH Vienna,
A.
samal@cesnet.cz
Factor
analysis was introduced to nuclear medicine in 1975 and its potential
to separate dynamic structures in scintigraphy demonstrated in 1980's.
Poor performance with clinical data established an opinion that the
method is good for laboratory but not clinical applications. Factor
analysis provides estimates of overlapping 'fuzzy' ROIs (factor images)
which are used to extract time-activity (factor) curves with minimum
user interaction. In dynamic renal scintigraphy, the method offers
a unique possibility to separate automatically the images and curves
of renal parenchyma and pelvis inside a whole-kidney ROI. In spite
of its past failures, the development of the method continued. The
aim of our presentation is a critical assessment of its current performance
based on recent developments.
In
a previous work, we analyzed 169 renal studies and demonstrated the
accuracy and precision of the method for the measurement of relative
renal function and parenchymal transit times.
The
question for the present experiment was whether the method could provide
new information and help to interpret diuretic response. We re-evaluated
55 MAG3 dynamic renal studies in 43 children (0.32-14.5 yrs) before
(+20) injection of a diuretic. Based on evaluation of diuretic response,
renal outflow was classified as normal (41), delayed (34), partially
(16), and completely (13) obstructed. Parameters (time to peak, half
time ratio 20/3, etc.) of standard and fuzzy ROI time-activity curves
were calculated for each class. Although most parameters correlated
significantly with outflow classes, the overlaps of individual values
did not allow discrimination. Better discrimination was obtained with
weighted combinations of the parameters. Parenchymal curves improved
discrimination between normal and pathological kidneys while the pelvic
curves improved discrimination between non-obstructed and obstructed
kidneys. Factor curves thus provide potentially useful additional
information especially when the whole-kidney curves are non-decreasing.
The principal advantage of factor to analysis, however, is not in
providing new unique information but in a reproducible, accurate and
automatic extraction of renal time-activity curves.
|
|
 |